The media is the enemy of the people. The MSM and their ridiculous fact checkers have only one task, to confuse and gaslight the public anytime there is a set of facts that hurt Democrats. These delusional people have never actually debunked any of the truth bombs that keep coming out about the 2020 election. This includes the latest truth bomb, the release of Dinesh D’Souza’s 2000 Mules (2022).
These “fact check” articles are sloppy, focus on semantics and do not actually fact check or debunk anything. Instead, they use double speak to gaslight people into dismissing anything that does not fit the democrat approved narrative. Personally, I doubt people read this nonsense. I think most people just read these articles to shut down any discussion of the underlying facts. I personally witnessed this multiple times on social media over the weekend.
The latest attempt to “fact check” any mention of the election fraud that we saw in the 2020 election was written by Ali Swenson and it was meant to debunk 2000 Mules (2022). Written for the Associated Press, it was picked up by USA Today, CNN, Washington Post and a host of other liberal media outlets to be used by brainwashed liberals on social media to debunk the very serious allegations of voter fraud in the 2020 election presented by the film 2000 Mules (2022). Spoiler alert: Ali Swenson’s article did not debunk anything.
2000 Mules (2022), which was directed by Dinesh D’Souza, shows incontrovertible proof that the 2020 election was the least secure election in our nation’s history. The film shows us a sophisticated ballot harvesting cartel hidden in plain sight. Five key swing states used not-for-profit organizations as stash houses to harvest ballots. They then used at least 2000 Mules to transport those ballots amongst the various dropboxes that were installed for the first time in 2020. There is 4 million minuets of official surveillance footage showing people going to multiple dropboxes, often in the middle of the night, often in latex gloves, to drop off multiple ballots. Some mules visited up to 28 dropboxes in a given day. Every single mule stopped at seven or eight not-for-profit organizations to pick up the harvested ballots in between trips to the dropboxes. However, it gets worse, the icing on the cake is that official footage shows these mules taking pictures of the dropboxes after they shove the ballots in the boxes.
I urge everyone to watch this movie for themselves. You will be horrified and saddened in equal measure and that is exactly what fake fact checkers like Ali Swensen are afraid of. These communist partisan hacks write these fact check articles in hopes that people will not actually watch the movie or examine the underlying facts for themselves. Well, I thought it would only be fitting to fact check the fact checker.
Claim: “Ballot Harvesting” is a pejorative term.
Ballot Harvesting ACTUALLY means the practice of allowing political operatives or others to collect voters’ ballots and turn them in en masse to polling stations. It is currently illegal in most states. In the swing states that were showcased in 2000 Mules (2022), ballot harvesting is illegal in every case except for when you allow a member of your family to drop off your ballot for you. Below are the laws for the states in question in 2000 Mules:
Georgia (Ga. Code Ann., § 21-2-385) A family member (including grandparent, grandchild, uncle, aunt, niece, nephew, and in-laws), household member or caregiver. A jail or other detention facility employee may return a ballot on behalf of a voter in custody.
Michigan (M.C.L.A. 168.764a) An immediate family member or household member may deliver a ballot to the clerk for the voter.
Arizona (Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 16-1005) A family member, household member or caregiver.
Pennsylvania (25 P.S. § 3146.6) Implied that only the voter may return their ballot: “the elector shall send same by mail, postage prepaid, except where franked, or deliver it in person to said county board of election.”
Michigan (M.C.L.A. 168.764a) An immediate family member or household member may deliver a ballot to the clerk for the voter.
Claim: The group’s claims of a paid ballot harvesting scheme are supported in the film only by one unidentified whistleblower from San Luis, Arizona, who said she saw people picking up what she assumed to be payments for ballot collection. The film contains no evidence of such payments in other states.
2000 Mules (2022) has 4 million minutes of footage showing mules who visit 10 or more dropboxes where they deposit multiple ballots into each dropbox. This is captured by official state surveillance footage. These mules are dropping off more than one or two ballots. Some of these people’s geotracking data shows them traveling to 28 different dropboxes in one day carrying up to five ballots per trip. The geotracking data also shows that they stopped by different not-for-profit organizations before and after they visited these dropboxes. Now factor in the video footage where multiple people took pictures of the dropboxes immediately after they drop off the ballots. Now add to that the whistleblower testimony described in Ali Swensen’s “fact check” and you have a compelling case that these people were paid to commit election fraud.
There is no logical, legal reason for one person to go to 20 dropboxes and drop multiple ballots into each dropbox in various counties throughout the state. Why would they do this? The question everyone should be asking is why would they stop by not-for-profits along the way? There is not one innocent or legal reason for this to happen.
Claim: A video of a voter dropping of a stack of ballots is not itself proof of wrongdoing, since most states have legal exceptions that let people drop off ballots on behalf of family members and household members.
This statement is made by a sloppy “journalist” who hopes that you will not actually see the film, because if you did watch the film, you would laugh at this patently absurd statement. In Georgia, for example, 250 people went to 50 dropboxes EACH and deposited 5 ballots. These people went to these dropboxes in the middle of the night. They went to dropboxes across different counties. They wore latex gloves and took them off immediately after the deposited the ballots. They visited not-for-profits in between dropbox visits and they took pictures of the dropboxes after they dropped the ballots in them. There is not one single plausible scenario in which this would be happening legally. This is shady, illegal and criminal. Not one single person can dispute that. And that is just one example of the many that can be found in 2000 Mules (2022).
Let us not forget that there is also official footage from the state of Georgia where one man went to 28 different dropboxes in one night and deposited stacks of ballots he picked up at not-for-profit organizations he stopped at along the way. The video footage in each case where video footage exists, directly lines up to the geotagging map laid out by True the Vote. This geotagging map is based on the cell phone information purchased which is directly connected to these mules.
The “fact checker” Ali Swenson, gives the reader an example of some random person who actually used the dropbox to vote legally in order to negate 4 million minuets of video footage which shows mules using the dropboxes in illegal ways. Highlighting one instance of a dropbox being used legally does not negate the mountain of video evidence obtained by True the Vote which shows how the dropboxes were used illegally. What Ali Swenson fails to tell you is that there is no reason for one person to go to seven not-for-profit organizations and then go to five, ten or twenty different dropboxes within one day to drop of stacks of ballots. That is called ballot harvesting and it is illegal in all of the 5 swing states in question in 2000 Mules.
Claim: True the Vote did not get any surveillance video of the dropboxes in Philidelphia. Therefore, Ali Swensen states that you need to disregard the geospatial data which tracked 1,155 mules who traveled to more than 20 dropboxes EACH because without video footage this could all be completely innocent.
In order to prop up this ridiculous claim, Ali Swenson provides the name of a partisan democrat senator who stated that he traveled between his two political offices in Philidelphia with 6 devices connected to the geotracking applications used by True the Vote. This senator also states he had two staff members in the car with him at all times who also had like three cell phones every time they passed a dropbox. This senator stated that he would pass a dropbox seven times a day but never dropped off any ballots.
Let’s start by pointing out that Ali Swenson found a highly partisan democrat operative who has no reason to be truthful, considering that in Philidelphia, democrats defied court orders just to keep Republican poll watchers away. Few of us can forget the footage we saw of Pam Bondi waiving around a court order which the Sheriff in Philidelphia ignored as he allowed democrats to continue counting votes while republicans stood outside.
But, even ignoring the highly partisan person Ali Swenson choose to use to “debunk” the evidence found by True the Vote in Philidelphia, her example still does not debunk the pattern that the geospatial data uncovered. That pattern of behavior is what makes these dropbox visits from the mules so damming. True the Vote only included mules who fit a very specific geospatial pattern. Each mule visited TWENTY dropboxes in various counties and in between visits to different not-for-profit companies. So democrat Senator Sharif Street only said he passed one dropbox seven or eight times per day but did not deposit any ballots. This specifically ignores the parameters True the Vote set out because they only included mules who went to multiple dropboxes per day unlike Senator Street. Additionally, when you use geospatial data you can clearly see if someone just drives by a location or drives to a location and lingers in front of it for a period of time. Again, Ali Swenson purposefully debunks something that was never in question in the original movie.
CLAIM: Alleged ballot harvesters used latex gloves to avoid putting their fingerprints on the ballots. This is false and in reality, they were just cold or trying to be cautious because of COVID-19.
To be honest I laughed when I read this. The movie shows footage of someone putting a chunk of ballots in a dropbox in the middle of the night with their car still running in the background. Once this person drops off the ballots, they take a picture of the dropbox for proof that they dropped off the ballots and then they take off the gloves and throw them out into the garbage before briskly walking to their running car and driving off. The same person did this at multiple dropboxes each day. If this had anything to do with COVID, they would not have taken off the gloves and thrown them in the garbage immediately after they handled the ballots. Additionally, if the gloves had anything to do with cold weather they would not have been latex gloves. The fact that latex gloves were worn solely to handle the ballots and discarded immediately after is proof positive that what we saw on the screen were the commission of felonies.
The entire fact check performed by Ali Swenson did not actually involve any facts, only flawed reasoning and faulty opinions. I would also like to address one last implied claim by this ridiculous fact check, the idea that geotracking or tracking people by their cell phone locations is not accurate or widely used. Geotagging is used by every law enforcement agency in the country. It was used by the FBI to find, prosecute and arrest people who were at the J6 protests, geotracking was also used to find the murders of an 8-year-old girl in Georgia that was killed after the Rayshard Brooks incident. It has been used by the CIA, the Department of Homeland Security and the army. Any claim that geotracking is not accurate is a bold-faced lie that can easily be disproven with a simple google search. Geotracking is extremely precise, so precise it is used by the military to take out foreign targets. In 2000 Mules (2022), it helps give us an accurate picture of how Democrats and their not-for-profit accomplices organized a ballot harvesting scheme that changed the course of the 2020 election. There is even official surveillance footage from certain states which completely corroborates the picture of events presented by True the Vote.
2000 Mules (2022) should be called 2000 Felonies because what we witnessed on screen were crimes. These mules should be investigated, questioned and charged because they represent the tip of the iceberg.
Ignore the fake “fact checkers” and watch the film. Learn to trust your own eyes.
If we win (we patriots), if the vote is 'true', then we have to 1) eliminate the RINO's who will resist 2) quickly enact laws that cover all the cheating ways that we have discovered 3) enact voter id
Polls show that voter ID is wanted by the majority of people.
And we need to WIDELY publicize the facts of the LAST ELECTION (before/during/after these IMPERATIVE laws that re-establish vote integrity)
We must 'kill' that 'vote fraud is rare' shibboleth.
If we can do that, we can eliminate the 'democrat' party as a political force IMO. At the least, we can set it back for long time.
We have to educate the citizens.
This is real.
This is cheating.
This has harmed the entire country. JB has gone a LONG way in bringing this country down ALL BY HIMSELF.
He is obviously an agent, although it may be difficult to tell for WHO. He's verifiably taken money from Ukraine, Russia, and China.
If we had a FBI (another BIG item on the TO DO list) we'd be able to find out WHO ELSE paid him (and his corrupt, evil son)
I don't care if it's Trump, if it's De Santis, or anybody, just that it's NOT the same old people. This country deserves PATRIOTS running it.
It's not going to last much longer.
Excellent 👏 👏 👏